I help founders identify bugs, usability issues and quality gaps before their users do. Practical, evidence-based testing from 13+ years of IT experience and 11+ years in software testing.
Example metrics and issues only — not client results.
Independent software verification, evidence and release decisions.
Explore case study →Plan, assign and track QA work with intelligent quality insights.
Explore case study →Independent client case studies will be added when publication permission and scope are confirmed.
Clear scope, actionable reports and straightforward pricing.
Landing pages, small websites and early MVPs
Target: 3 working days after acceptance
Request Starter ReviewSaaS MVPs, e-commerce and web applications
Target: 5 working days after acceptance
Request Detailed AuditComplex products, releases and ongoing QA
Quotation and timeline agreed in advance
Discuss RequirementsPaid packages are proposed introductory offers. Scope and timing are confirmed before engagement. No package guarantees a defect-free product.
| Testing type | Starter | Detailed | Custom* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smoke / basic functional | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Exploratory and negative | Limited | ✓ | ✓ |
| Responsive / usability | Basic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cross-browser | — | Limited | Optional |
| Accessibility | — | Basic | Optional |
| API / automation | — | — | Optional |
| Retesting | — | 1 focused round | Agreed |
*Custom capabilities are included only when selected in the statement of work.
Steps: Add product → checkout → enter expired code → apply.
Expected: Expired code rejected.
Actual: Discount accepted.
Impact: Potential revenue loss.
Selected review work and transparent status. Public summaries only; no confidential defect reports or implied endorsements.
Independent review of public website routes, usability and content consistency. The macOS application was not part of the completed website review.
Read scope and approach →Documentation and rule consistency review with findings and follow-up testing needs. Full behavioural verification is not claimed.
Read scope and limitations →Brand names are used only to identify review subjects. These summaries are not endorsements; detailed evidence will be published only with permission.
If I reviewed your website, product or documentation, you can submit honest feedback. Reviews are checked before anything appears publicly, and publication requires your consent.
No testimonials have been published yet. Free and pro bono reviews will be labelled transparently.
Yes, for the first 20 accepted projects. The free scope covers up to 60 minutes and three key pages or flows, with a short findings summary. No payment details are requested.
No. I will review requests manually and confirm acceptance and scope by email. No live availability counter is displayed.
A public URL or authorised test environment, your top priorities and any test accounts needed for agreed workflows. Please do not send passwords in the application form.
No private testing evidence or sensitive findings will be published without permission. The contact request is used only to discuss your review.
No. Basic security observations are not penetration testing, and accessibility checks are not a full compliance audit unless specifically scoped.
Tell me what you're building and what you'd like tested. I'll review your request and confirm the scope and next steps.
Free reviews are limited to the first 20 accepted projects, subject to capacity. Availability is confirmed personally; no unverified spot counter is shown.
This form opens your email app with a prepared message. Nothing is sent until you press Send in your email app. Do not include passwords or private data.